Greg Schuck

Greg Schuck

Partner

Our Attorneys
“I do everything I can to get to know my clients, how they operate their business and what is important to them. My goal is to become part of their team so that I can best represent their interests.”

Greg Schuck

Print Profile

Direct

Phone
205.297.8833

Fax
205.251.1256

Email
gschuck@huielaw.com

Social
LinkedIn

Practice Areas

Appellate

Automotive Litigation

Class Action / Complex Litigation

Cybersecurity Liability

Discovery Practice and Procedure

Medical Device Litigation

Product Liability

Trucking Litigation

  • Bio

    Greg Schuck is driven to see justice served. Life may not always be fair, but there is a right side and wrong side to every argument, and Greg’s clients can always count on him to do what’s right on their behalf. Concentrating on product liability, trucking, medical device, complex/class action litigation and electronic discovery, Greg brings an engineering expertise that few attorneys can claim. In addition to serving clients primarily in the Southeastern United States, Greg is admitted to practice throughout the State of Alabama as well as before the United States Supreme Court.

    Since joining the firm in 1994, Greg has tried over 44 cases to verdict, handling matters in State and Federal courts in Alabama, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia. For every client and each case, Greg is prepared, competitive and committed. By providing big picture, strategic thinking and dedicated personal attention, Greg becomes more than his client’s lawyer, he becomes their partner.

    When he’s not working, Greg enjoys playing golf, hunting and spending most of his free time with his two children.

    Greg earned his BS from The University of Alabama and his JD from Cumberland School of Law at Samford University.

    Bar & Court Admissions

    Alabama State Bar

    United States Supreme Court

    United States District Courts for the Northern, Middle, and Southern Districts of Alabama

    Memberships

    Alabama Defense Lawyers Association

    Alabama Automotive Manufacturers Association

    American Bar Association

    Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine

    Birmingham Bar Association

    Defense Research Institute

    Society of Automotive Engineers

  • Representative Experience
    01
    02

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving handling and stability allegations following a tread separation.  The crash resulted in one death. The case was tried in the Circuit Court for Seminole County, FL in February 2017.

    03

    Favorable settlement for automotive manufacturer during trial in a case involving handling, stability, and seat belt allegations.  The crash resulted in one death and one serious injury. The case was tried in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in May 2013.

    04

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving handling, stability and glazing allegations.  The crash resulted in one death. The case was tried in the Circuit Court for Jefferson County, Kentucky in March 2013.

    05

    Adverse verdict, favorably settled on appeal, representing automotive manufacturer in a case involving handling, stability, and seat belt allegations against an automotive manufacturer.  The crash resulted in one death. The case was tried in the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida in January 2013.

    06

    Favorable settlement for automotive manufacturer during trial in a case involving handling and stability allegations.  The crash resulted in a traumatic amputation. The case was tried in the Circuit Court of Etowah County, Alabama in October 2012.

    07

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving the rollover of a pick-up truck.  Plaintiff alleged the vehicle should have been equipped with rollover side curtain restraint to prevent partial ejection.  The crash resulted in one death. The case was tried in the Circuit Court for Houston County, Alabama in August 2012.

    08

    Mistrial representing automotive manufacturer in a case involving handling, stability, and seat belt allegations.  The crash resulted in one death. The case was tried in the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida in June 2012.

    09

    Mistrial representing automotive manufacturer following 4-week trial in a case involving handling, stability, and seat belt allegations.  The crash resulted in one death. The case was tried in the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida in October 2011.

    10

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving handling and stability allegations following a tread separation.  The crash resulted in one death. The case was tried in the Circuit Court for Duval County, Florida in February 2011.

    11

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving handling and stability allegations following a road rage incident.  The crash resulted in a traumatic brain injury. The case was tried in the Superior Court of Middlesex County, New Jersey in August 2010.

    12

    Adverse verdict, subsequently reversed on appeal (70 So.3d 1177 (Ala. 2011)), in a case involving handling and stability allegations.  The crash resulted in a traumatic amputation. The case was tried in the Circuit Court of Etowah County, Alabama in September and October 2009.

    13

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving manufacturing and stability allegations arising from an intersectional crash that resulted in a traumatic brain injury. The case was tried in the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida in October 2008.

    14

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving handling, stability, and roof structure allegations.  The crash resulted in one death. The case was tried in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Florida in February and March 2008.

    15

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving handling and stability allegations following a tread separation.  The crash resulted in two injuries and one death. The case was tried in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi in September 2007.

    16

    Mistrial representing automotive manufacturer in a case involving manufacturing and stability allegations arising from an intersectional crash that resulted in a traumatic brain injury. The case was tried in the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida in November 2006.

    17

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving handling and stability allegations.  The crash resulted in four deaths and one personal injury.  The case was tried in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in December 2005.

    18

    Adverse verdict, subsequently reversed and settled on appeal, representing automotive manufacturer in a case involving handling, stability, and side window glazing allegations.  The crash resulted in two deaths and one personal injury. The case was tried in the District Court of Zavala County, Texas in February 2005.

    19

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving handling and stability allegations.  The crash resulted in two deaths and one traumatic brain injury.  The case was tried in the Circuit Court of Pickens County, Alabama in June 2004.

    20

    Favorable settlement for automotive manufacturer during trial in a case involving handling and stability allegations.  The crash resulted in one death and one serious injury. The case was tried in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in August 2003.

    21

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving handling and stability allegations.  The crash resulted in two deaths.  The case was tried in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in June 2003.

    22

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving alleged brake failure.  The incident resulted in personal injuries and significant property damage.  The case was tried in the Circuit Court of Madison County, Alabama in November 2001.

    23

    Defense verdict for lift truck manufacturer in a case alleging lack of back-up warning devices.  The incident resulted in a traumatic amputation and related injuries.  The case tried in the Circuit Court of Coweta County, Georgia in July 2001.

    24

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving a fan blade failure.  The incident resulted in severe personal injuries.  The case was tried in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama in January 2001.

    25

    Defense verdict for automotive manufacturer in a case involving sudden acceleration allegations.  The plaintiff, a police officer, allegedly suffered from major depression and post‑traumatic stress disorder as the result of an accident involving his police cruiser.  The case was tried in the Circuit Court of St. Clair County, Alabama in November 2000.

    26

    Defense verdict for trucking company in side-swipe collision.  The plaintiff suffered severe injuries because of the crash.  The case was tried in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama in May 2000.

    27

    Mistrial representing lift truck manufacturer in a case alleging lack of back-up warning devices.  The incident resulted in a traumatic amputation and related injuries.  The case tried in the Circuit Court of Coweta County, Georgia in September 1999.

  • Resources & News
    Greg Schuck
    WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => post [s] => Greg Schuck [paged] => 1 [posts_per_page] => 10 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => post [s] => Greg Schuck [paged] => 1 [posts_per_page] => 10 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [search_terms_count] => 2 [search_terms] => Array ( [0] => Greg [1] => Schuck ) [search_orderby_title] => Array ( [0] => wp_posts.post_title LIKE '{b596d8c4737afffcd359a5a6ea14555e165414d28d8d176729297f00d150a707}Greg{b596d8c4737afffcd359a5a6ea14555e165414d28d8d176729297f00d150a707}' [1] => wp_posts.post_title LIKE '{b596d8c4737afffcd359a5a6ea14555e165414d28d8d176729297f00d150a707}Schuck{b596d8c4737afffcd359a5a6ea14555e165414d28d8d176729297f00d150a707}' ) [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=2 [posts] => Array ( ) [post_count] => 0 [current_post] => -1 [in_the_loop] => [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 0 [max_num_pages] => 0 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => 1 [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 09cd696676859d3076b93e7d7c2b6ced [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => [thumbnails_cached] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => about [1] => an [2] => are [3] => as [4] => at [5] => be [6] => by [7] => com [8] => for [9] => from [10] => how [11] => in [12] => is [13] => it [14] => of [15] => on [16] => or [17] => that [18] => the [19] => this [20] => to [21] => was [22] => what [23] => when [24] => where [25] => who [26] => will [27] => with [28] => www ) [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) )
    01
    02

    Defense Verdict for Ford Motor Company in Florida

    Huie attorney Greg Schuck secured a defense verdict for Ford Motor Company on March 2, 2017, in Seminole County, Florida. In June 2010, the 19-year-old Plaintiff’s decedent was involved in...

    03
    04

    Huie wins defense verdict in Ford case

    Greg Schuck, Paul Malek and Jennifer Reid of Huie, Fernambucq & Stewart successfully defended Ford Motor Company in a wrongful death product liability case involving the death of a passenger...

    05

    16 Huie Attorneys Named As The Best Lawyers in America©

    ...Walt Price Insurance Law Litigation – Health Care Litigation – Insurance Medical Malpractice Law – Defendants Greg Schuck Product Liability Litigation – Defendants Jennifer Segers Insurance Law Litigation – Insurance...

    06
    07
    08

    Huie Published in 2021 Best Lawyers in America

    ...Defendants Greg L. Schuck Product Liability Litigation – Defendants Jennifer Devereaux Segers Insurance Law Litigation – Insurance Medical Malpractice Law – Defendants Jim Shaw Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants Product...

    09

    Huie Receives Multiple Honors from Best Lawyers

    ...Insurance Law Litigation – Health Care Litigation – Insurance Medical Malpractice Law – Defendants Gregory L. Schuck Product Liability Litigation – Defendants Jennifer Devereaux Segers Insurance Law Litigation – Insurance...

    10
  • Distinctions & Contributions
    01

    Listed by The Best Lawyers in America since 2016 for Product Liability Litigation - Defendants (2016-2021)

    02
    03
    04

    Presenter, American Bar Association 2018 TIPS Emerging Issues in Motor Vehicle Product Liability Litigation Conference; "Lessons Learned From Recent High Profile Recalls: Litigation Fallout And Challenges To Scope And Efficacy Of Automotive Recalls"

    05

    Co-author of “The Application of Seat Belt Laws in Automotive Trials”, For the Defense (DRI), December 2009

    06

    Frequently lectures in the areas of trial skills, product liability and electronic discovery

Back to Our Attorneys